I would take very strong exception to that on behalf of a lot of folks on both sides of the aisle. We do, and we can, and we will.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I would take very strong exception to that on behalf of a lot of folks on both sides of the aisle. We do, and we can…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing comments about the balanced budget amendment during a debate.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
Reclaiming my time, I take back time because again you are totally misleading the body when you make that statement. If you go back to PAYGO as was originally passed in this body in 1990, repassed in 1993, repassed in 1997 with Republican…
I rise in deep sadness about the way this House is being run. A rule which denies the ranking member of the Committee on Ways and Means an opportunity to offer a serious, responsible amendment on an issue as important as this is should…
I think it is a fascinating argument. We have heard it time and time and time again. My friend talks about the lack of controlling of spending. Let me remind, Mr. Speaker, you control this House. You control the Senate. You control the…
I will say that everything he has said is 100 percent the truth. We did not mention Social Security. I deliberately did not mention Social Security because that is not the issue here. Everything the gentleman said in the letter from the…





