I truly have enjoyed attempting to work with him and several others on his side of the aisle who have attempted to be consistent. The bill today is not consistent. That is my problem. You cannot be on the floor one week arguing for gigantic tax cuts and then the next week coming in for saying debt reduction. You cannot do that in an honest sense. You can do it in a political sense, and I realize that is what we are doing today. I happen to have been here during the Reagan-Bush years. Only one of those 12 years did the Congress, the big-spending liberal Congress that we have heard so many times referred to, only one time in those 12 years did the Congress ever spend more than Presidents Reagan and Bush asked us to spend. I say that to say, let us stop the finger pointing. There is enough blame. I give credit to my colleagues on the other side for those things which they have attempted to do. But I have a healthy disagreement with the budget priorities they have brought.
Charles W. Stenholm: “I truly have enjoyed attempting to work with him and several others on his side of the aisle who have attempted to be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget priorities and tax cuts during a floor speech.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
I want to say it is with a little bit of mixed emotion tonight that I address this body for the last time. I guess it kind of came to me in a real way just a moment ago when my grandson, who is sitting beside me, asked me a moment ago…
You have spent more, period, and that record stands up. All we are talking about today is a simple resolution saying, let us put us all under the gun. If you put your budget on the floor under pay-as-you-go, I will have to vote for it, if…
I will say that everything he has said is 100 percent the truth. We did not mention Social Security. I deliberately did not mention Social Security because that is not the issue here. Everything the gentleman said in the letter from the…
I must respectfully differ with the chairman of the Committee on Rules. The majority has justified the decision of the Committee on Rules to not allow the minority to offer an amendment because it is not a complete substitute. That…





