On the recordMarch 1, 2001
There has been a decision made, apparently by the leadership... to bring forward a major tax bill before we have had an opportunity to have a good bipartisan discussion of the budget?
Source
govinfo.govCharles W. Stenholm: “There has been a decision made, apparently by the leadership... to bring forward a major tax bill before we have had an…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the leadership's decision to advance a major tax bill without prior budget discussion.
Share
More from Charles W. Stenholm
Jun 24, 2004
I come to the floor very disappointed because once again the majority has chosen not to allow the Blue Dogs to have our amendment considered. I would like to ask the gentleman from Washington, why did his committee allow 19 amendments…
Jun 22, 2004
I appreciate the refreshingly honest statement of the gentleman from Kansas and what he just said because he stated quite clearly this is a vote to increase the debt ceiling. I want to ask the gentlewoman from North Carolina if she concurs…
Jul 20, 2004
You are mischaracterizing my amendment. We are suggesting that the tax cuts be extended through next year. You are describing something that is not going to happen in my amendment, leaving a wrong impression with the people that might be…
Jun 24, 2004
Sometimes it is rather amusing if you have been around for a few years, as I have. The last time this was seriously discussed, my friends on this side of the aisle opposed it. They believe the expedited rescission was a bad idea and that…
Other voices in this conversation
