I do not know where his figures come from, but the Joint Committee on Taxation, which distributes and scores this bill, has distributed the benefit of this bill so that 76 percent goes to people under $75,000 of income. Now, with the addition of the change in the child credit and other things that were done, it is even more that goes to people who are under $75,000, and primarily between $20,000 and $75,000 of income. What has added more regressivity to this bill is the fact that those who favored the cigarette tax have put in place a tax that is the most regressive tax in the bill. Irrespective of how one feels about cigarette taxes, when the scoring is done on regressivity, that pushes more of the burden onto the very, very low-income people. So I wish we would just get the facts before the Congress and before the people.
Bill Archer: “I do not know where his figures come from, but the Joint Committee on Taxation, which distributes and scores this bill…”
Editor's note · Context
Refuting claims about the tax bill's benefits during a debate on tax legislation.
Share
More from Bill Archer
Mr. Speaker, today we make one last attempt to end the marriage tax penalty for 25 million married couples. Since 1995, a growing bipartisan majority in the Congress has tried time and time again to end this gross unfairness in the Tax…
Well, needless to say, for one who continued to do his own tax return, simplification has a lot of appeal to me.
Several Members in support of the Rangel substitute... have begged us to adopt the Rangel substitute because their farmers need help now. Well, I find it curious that the Farm Bureau has endorsed not the Rangel substitute but the…
If this bill does not pass, the FSC provisions that have been railed against by the opponents will continue to be in the law. None of that will change. What they call a subsidy, which is actually a reduction of the impediment of double…





