I have to tell you, the question was asked earlier what has changed, and I rarely have changed my position on any issue over the last 8 years, but today I am going to change my position on this issue after careful research because the world has changed. It changed September 11, and we have to listen to our intelligence community and make informed decisions. Why should we be concerned? Well, the President has said those nations that harbor terrorists are terrorists and should be treated as such. We have concerns in our intelligence community about Cuba harboring terrorists. What about the proliferation, production, of biological weapons? We have information in our intelligence community that Cuba is up to no good. Mr. Chairman, this is not the time to try something new.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing changes in policy regarding Cuba in light of national security concerns.
Share
More from Zach Wamp
the reality of 2008 is that the nexus between national security, energy, and the environment is the most important public policy issue that we face in this country. The nexus has a lot of different angles to it, but these three issues…
I want to begin elementally by saying that the nexus between energy and national security and our environment is the most important policy challenge of our time. And all of the conflicts of the world have some relation to those three…
We need to look at ways to take those walls down, especially with the needs that we hear about and the stress that is there with multiple deployments.
We need to have a comprehensive program that will target therapy development, and that is what we don't have in the United States, and we don't have in our V.A. system.





