I believe we should go back and look at the way the bill is written. This is a limited carve-out. This is not a huge carve-out. Basically, what this carve-out says is, because of the unique situation of the self-insured, self-administered plans, we are going to exempt them from lawsuits, based on contract, in Federal court--they are not going to be exempt from other lawsuits and in State courts, and based on medical decisions. So it is a limited carve-out. I do not want anybody who is watching this debate to think this is some huge carve-out. It is a carve-out on a limited basis. Our intent was to treat people equally who were in that unique circumstance. I say to my colleague from New Hampshire, this may not be perfect, but we think it improves the status quo. That is sort of what we are about today: Trying to improve the status quo.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the specifics of a bill related to self-insured, self-administered plans.
Share
More from William H. Frist
After 33 years of service to the U.S. Senate, Linda Sebold has decided to retire. Linda began her Senate career with the Office of the Secretary of the Senate back in August of 1973, and until this day Linda remains totally dedicated to…
I wish to briefly comment on health care policy which we have been able to accomplish over the last several years. As most people know, for 20 years before I entered politics, I devoted my life to healing and to helping people one-on-one…
I do want to add my congratulations to the managers, Senators Warner and Levin. They have done a tremendous job on the Defense authorization bill, a very important bill. We had several pauses over the course of today that we were able to…
6 years ago, my great-nephew had some peanut butter. He was 13 months old. For most 13-month-old children, this wouldn't be an issue. But for McClain Portis, it was. You see, unbeknownst to him or his parents at the time, McClain is…





