The Washington Post has repeatedly and emphatically called on the Democratic leadership to stop these demands for confidential memoranda. I was wondering if the Senator had seen the Washington Post editorial from last September that said, ``Seeking Mr. Estrada's work product as a government lawyer is beyond any reasonable inquiry into what sort of judge he would be. Nor is it fair to reject someone as a judge because that person's decision to practice law rather than write articles or engage in politics makes his views more opaque.'' Does the Senator agree that these demands go beyond any reasonable inquiry and are instead a gimmick and an attempt to prevent this nominee from ever getting a vote?
William H. Frist: “The Washington Post has repeatedly and emphatically called on the Democratic leadership to stop these demands for…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the nomination of Miguel Estrada and the scrutiny of his work as a government lawyer.
Share
More from William H. Frist
That is exactly where we are. I think the good news is both sides recognize this is a very important issue before this body and before the American people and that we have had a lot of work on this bill to where I think--speaking of the…
The reason I am turning around is, as the Democratic leader said, people have been working very aggressively since the agreement was reached. And every change, we have really tried to go to both sides--to the House, to the Senate, to the…
Right on top of the 10 requests is the unanimous consent request that the Armed Services Committee be authorized to meet during the session. For the information of our colleagues, there had been an objection earlier today. I talked to the…
Betsy DeVos will bring a renewed sense of urgency and focus to improving schools in neighborhoods across America.





