The issue of the Patients' Bill of Rights is very important to me. As my colleague from Oklahoma has pointed out, we have collectively, as the U.S. Senate, spent a lot of time on this particular issue. Given the fact that we do have a number of bills--and I know we are anxious to get to the underlying bill right now--isn't it reasonable, given the opportunity, that we can put into these bills a Patients' Bill of Rights, or anything we want to, based on the unanimous consent right now? Isn't it reasonable to limit that discussion so that we can conduct the Senate's business, since we can put as much as we want into these bills right now and also allow them to be subjected to the amendments of the unanimous consent?
William H. Frist: “The issue of the Patients' Bill of Rights is very important to me. As my colleague from Oklahoma has pointed out, we…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Patients' Bill of Rights during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from William H. Frist
The reason I am turning around is, as the Democratic leader said, people have been working very aggressively since the agreement was reached. And every change, we have really tried to go to both sides--to the House, to the Senate, to the…
It is interesting, when you are around here at 2:30 in the morning... It is very important as we all work together to make the country a safer, healthier, and stronger place.
The legislation that leaves this Senate floor absolutely must achieve two goals: first, preserve the intelligence programs that we know have saved American lives; second, protect classified information from terrorists who could exploit it…
We began consideration of the very important port security bill on Thursday of last week, and earlier in the week we addressed the Department of Defense appropriations bill. We generally agreed as a body that we would address the security…





