Frankly, I do not think this is a huge deal. The reality is that the vast majority of businesses will go under designated decisionmaker, and, in fact, we provide in the bill that it is automatic. That will just happen unless they make a conscious decision to say: We do not want to do the designated decisionmaker; we want to go under the direct participation language. We are in an unknown area, and I do not think anyone knows how this is going to play out entirely in the real world and what decisions they are going to make. Some people come up with some scenarios under which they would not want to designate someone as a designated decisionmaker. The vast majority are. We wanted to provide this as a fallback position, more options. I do not think it is going to make it more ambiguous or less definite because we provide automatically it is going to be designated decisionmaker unless they make an action and say: No, we do not want designated decisionmaker; we want to go with our model because for some reason it works that way.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the rationale behind a bill regarding decision-making options for employers.
Share
More from William H. Frist
in May of this year, this body passed comprehensive immigration reform. We are a nation of immigrants, but we are also a nation of laws. We must honor both of those heritages. Accordingly, we pursued in this body a four-pronged approach to…
I hope everyone has had a good Thanksgiving recess--enjoyable, relaxing. We have a busy few days ahead of us as we have our final week for the 109th Congress, and there are a number of priorities we need to address. We have the Gates…
Betsy DeVos will bring a renewed sense of urgency and focus to improving schools in neighborhoods across America.
like all of my colleagues in this body, I recognize that our immigration system needs vast improvements. While we have spent a great deal of time discussing immigration over the past year, it appears unlikely that this body will pass…





