Indeed, Mr. President. In response to my distinguished colleague, the issue of relevance has become an issue. Therefore, in the unanimous consent request I said, `` `relevant be related to the subject matter of the bill' and/or energy related.'' That is really to add what I think the Senator's concern is--is this relevancy going to be so tight that something having to do with energy will be excluded? By adding this clause, ``energy related,'' it is the understanding that we will consider other amendments on the list.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the relevance of amendments related to energy in a unanimous consent request.
Share
More from William H. Frist
as I depart this body, I would like to extend a heartfelt personal thank you to Chaplain Barry Black. From comforting staff and Members in the wake of tragic deaths to leading erudite Bible study groups, to opening the Senate each morning…
for 5 years we have been a nation at war. It is a war unlike any we have ever before fought. It is an ideological war against radicals and zealots. We are fighting a different kind of enemy--an enemy who seeks to destroy our values, to…
about 2 months ago, late Sunday afternoon, when no one was around, I came into this Chamber to carry out a time-honored tradition, nearly as old as the institution itself. I came over to this desk and I opened the drawer and the tradition…
there is a very common question I been asked over the last several days: During your 4-year tenure as majority leader, what has been the most constitutionally challenging issue confronting the Senate? I didn't have to think very long. I…





