Indeed, Mr. President. In response to my distinguished colleague, the issue of relevance has become an issue. Therefore, in the unanimous consent request I said, `` `relevant be related to the subject matter of the bill' and/or energy related.'' That is really to add what I think the Senator's concern is--is this relevancy going to be so tight that something having to do with energy will be excluded? By adding this clause, ``energy related,'' it is the understanding that we will consider other amendments on the list.
William H. Frist: “Indeed, Mr. President. In response to my distinguished colleague, the issue of relevance has become an issue. Therefore…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the relevance of amendments related to energy in a unanimous consent request.
Share
More from William H. Frist
Today we continued debate on the Department of Defense Appropriations bill that we started before the August recess. We have three amendments pending, and we expect to have more amendments offered tomorrow. Votes can be expected before the…
The reason I am turning around is, as the Democratic leader said, people have been working very aggressively since the agreement was reached. And every change, we have really tried to go to both sides--to the House, to the Senate, to the…
We have this promise of a new relationship between our Nation and India, which is the world's largest democracy, and it is a relationship President Bush has begun to construct. That can only grow if Congress delivers on the commitment the…
Right on top of the 10 requests is the unanimous consent request that the Armed Services Committee be authorized to meet during the session. For the information of our colleagues, there had been an objection earlier today. I talked to the…





