this is quite a debate that we are having tonight, and I appreciate the vigor and the energy that colleagues on both sides are bringing to this debate. Mr. Chairman, I do have to stand and really oppose some of the things that are being said here. How interesting it is that we are hearing spending reductions called irresponsible, that we are hearing that it is jeopardizing our foreign operations, that it is devastating. You know, what we may want to do is reframe this debate. I want to commend the gentleman from Georgia for trying to make a 1 percent reduction. Now we heard this referred to as the Matthew 25 bill. Maybe we should make it the Genesis 1:1 bill and go back and look at the beginning and talk about how did we get where we are today. They want to talk about deficits. Well, it is historically what my colleagues on the left have done to grow a huge bureaucracy that continues to need to be fed and programs that grow and grow and grow. Now one of the things that we have heard is that we are going to have to fix this now. My colleagues only want to talk about today, yesterday or the day before. They don't want to go back and talk about previous administrations where we have piled on, we have piled on, we have piled on, and now we want to grow this budget 9\1/2\ percent. We want to pay for it with the largest tax increase in history. I would offer to my friends that, yes, indeed, let's go back and make it a Genesis 1:1 bill and look at the very beginning.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budgetary concerns and spending reductions during a debate.
Share
More from Marsha Blackburn
First responders in Tennessee need access to reliable technology that will help them locate trapped individuals in confined spaces where radio signals fail.
As Acting AG, @DAGToddBlanche has already demonstrated his ability to crack down on crime, stop fraudsters from robbing Americans blind, and restore one tier of justice for all. I look forward to voting to confirm him and am confident he…
Insurance regulation has long been, and should remain, a responsibility of the states. The Federal Insurance Office Abolishment Act would eliminate unnecessary federal overreach, cut red tape, and return power to the states.
Parents shouldn’t have to win the lottery to have a say in their child’s education.





