When you have a government-run program, what you are doing is putting bureaucrats in charge of your health care decisions, and you are removing that doctor-patient relationship many times. You are putting a barrier there between the individual and that doctor. Someone else that is removed from the process is making that decision; thereby it removes the patient many times from that decision process. That is something that we do not want to see this Nation run toward. Our seniors, our families want to be able to participate in making those health care decisions for themselves. We are so pleased to know that the President will talk about, as I said earlier, the private sector free market-based approach to solving our health care problem. Mr. Speaker, that is what it is going to require, innovation, thinking outside of the box and being certain of something we know: access, affordability, and preserving that doctor-patient relationship.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of government-run health care programs.
Share
More from Marsha Blackburn
Public safety is one of the top priorities for Tennesseans and continuing to build on the progress of the Memphis Safe Task Force is a key part of my vision for Tennessee.
Without a duty of care, Big Tech companies will maintain the status quo of putting profit before the safety of our children. We need a strong federal standard in place that will ensure Big Tech companies can’t design their products to…
Taxpayers should not be spending a penny on research done by those who want to push harmful gender transition surgeries and radical gender ideology on our kids.
The Daughters of the American Revolution was founded by women for women, and its founders would be appalled that the organization is now allowing biological males to become members.





