I am concerned about a recent GAO report that identifies more than $180 million in unused construction funds from prior year appropriations at the Department of Energy. Among the GAO lists are 45 completed or terminated construction projects with carryover funds totaling around $46 million. It is my understanding that these funds can remain on the books for years and that DOE can reprogram those leftover funds as the need arises, sometimes on projects completely unrelated to the original intent of Congress. In the current budget climate at present, it seems to me this accounting procedure may be flawed, and as we work toward balancing our books and exercise congressional prerogatives in terms of directing how these leftover funds are used, these unneeded carryover funds should be used for deficit reduction or at least to ease shortfalls that can occur in the otherwise austere budget climate.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about unused construction funds at the Department of Energy during a discussion on budget appropriations.
Share
More from John Tanner
The genocide in Darfur has taken a horrific toll on that region. Well over 60 percent of the villages have been destroyed, 2 million people displaced, 400,000 killed, and 200,000 driven into refugee camps in neighboring Chad. Thanks to the…
This resolution commending the NATO School for its critical efforts to promote peace, stability and security is something long overdue, in my opinion. Last year, I had the honor of participating in a visit of the bipartisan House…
You are talking about OPEC and the price of gasoline. Gasoline in July was $3-plus a gallon. Can you name one thing that has changed between July and now as it relates to the world situation that would make gasoline come down? The…
trade is not a political issue; trade is an economic issue. The economics of this agreement are such that Peru, if you voted for the Andean trade preference, already has access to our markets without regard to tariffs and duty. This is the…





