Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 15, 1995
Those of us who support the Edwards amendment take a back seat to no one in supporting a strong national defense. But we believe that setting the wrong priorities diverts needed funding in a deleterious way for necessary technology and equipment for our front-line men and women. Effective theater missile defense systems are being built to protect our people here at home and our U.S. and allied forces abroad. Research and development must continue so we will be able to deploy a national missile defense system whenever a threat to our shore emerges. I strongly support that, research and development. But this Contract With America provision will risk national security when deployment of space-based interceptors diverts billions of scarce defense dollars and resources from acquisition funds that provide our soldiers and sailors protection from Scuds and other theater missile attacks. That is what our military leaders will tell us and that is what is real national security.
Said by
John Tanner
Tennessee

Editor's note · Context

Discussing national defense priorities and the impact of the Edwards amendment.

Share

More from John Tanner

Jan 14, 2009

What we are attempting to do is to reestablish congressional oversight. Congress authorizes and appropriates money, but we don't actually spend it. So when we are asking the administration, whoever it may be, Democrat, Republican, whoever…

govinfo.gov
Jan 14, 2009

We believe that having such a systematic approach to oversight enshrined in the Rules of the House would greatly enhance Congressional oversight of executive agencies' programs and functions. As you may know, POGO is a non-partisan…

govinfo.gov
Sep 28, 2010

I want to thank Mr. Capuano and Members of the House Sudan Caucus for introducing this resolution to remind us of the important work that needs to be done to implement the final stages of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement between the…

govinfo.gov
Jun 12, 2008

I think I speak for a lot of us when we say that we welcome an intellectually honest debate on the issues that we are charged with confronting on behalf of the American people. And a discussion about the pros and cons of the provisions of…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation