Mr. Speaker, I just wish we were talking about the marriage tax penalty. We are talking about a budget process... If my colleagues want to know why the American people are overtaxed, they are overtaxed because they are paying $240 billion every year in interest payments. And until we have a budget to know where these matters fit, these tax cuts that we all support, like the marriage tax penalty, no sane, rational business person in this country would go about cutting their income before they knew where they stood and what is their outgo. We say, unless they have a creditable framework where we know we are going to retire debt, where we know we are going to take care of Social Security and Medicare, where we know, is it a higher priority to cut taxes on married people like they say they have but which they do not, but like they say it is to take care of rural health care needs in this country? If my colleagues believe that, then vote for this rule.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the budget process and the marriage tax penalty.
Share
More from John Tanner
Mr. Speaker, on September 14, 1960, President Eisenhower signed legislation into law, creating real estate investment trusts. House Resolution 1595 celebrates the 50th anniversary of REITs, as they are called, and the enhanced…
I rise today in support of H. Res. 1337 to acknowledge the difficulties facing many Tennesseans as a result of the severe weather that struck our area recently. Sadly, the storms that hit our area took seven lives in the 19 counties that…
Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Madam Speaker, if we were in Afghanistan by ourselves, perhaps this debate would be worthwhile, but the fact is we are not. I am presently serving as the president of the NATO Parliamentary Assembly. The Afghan…
The genocide in Darfur has taken a horrific toll on that region. Well over 60 percent of the villages have been destroyed, 2 million people displaced, 400,000 killed, and 200,000 driven into refugee camps in neighboring Chad. Thanks to the…





