But immediately prior to the incident, your agency in its wisdom had given Babcock & Wilcox an excellent rating for its safeguards and security work, and they received their full $51 million incentive fee in fiscal year 2011, even though, as has been testified to, the cameras weren't working on a wholesale basis, took months and months to ever do repairs. Why do they get their entire incentive fee right prior to the incident?
Cooper questions the rationale behind awarding a full incentive fee despite security failures.
Share
More from Jim Cooper
How is the administration thinking about arms control and strategic stability following Russia's invasion of Ukraine?
I request the witnesses keep their opening remarks to no more than 5 minutes, and that members respect the same time limit for their questioning.
I should remind you that President Trump, I think, did very little if anything to help with the third missile site while he was President.
Other voices in this conversation
