Yes indeed, Madam President. That would be my view also. The ``relation back'' provision merely relates to determining when a security interest in a motor vehicle is perfected in accordance with State law. Clarifying that ``relation back'' statutes are consistent with the Federal law does not change the uniformity of the Federal law. As the Chairman knows, Federal uniformity is keyed to the date on which the debtor receives possession of such property which then activates the running of the 20 day-period under section 547.
James Sasser: “Yes indeed, Madam President. That would be my view also. The ``relation back'' provision merely relates to determining…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the 'relation back' provision and its implications for federal and state law regarding security interests.
Share
More from James Sasser
It is my understanding, that every appellate circuit that has examined this issue has held that State laws that allow the timing of perfection to ``relate back'' to an earlier date are consistent with and not in conflict with Federal…
My thanks are to Senator Boxer for her tireless efforts on behalf of these children's programs. The Budget Committee, as well as America's children, have been well served by her participation in this year's budget process.
You have a paranoid, isolated, dangerous state now on the verge of possessing nuclear weapons.
Is the Senator from Indiana trying to represent that this is a refundable tax credit to people who make under $16,000 a year?





