We restored in the Budget Committee 70 percent of the President's cut of the so-called low-income home energy assistance, and we also tried to increase funding for prenatal care. The thrust of this amendment offered by the Senator from Pennsylvania is in agreement with the priorities that we are pursuing in the Budget Committee. So I would just say, Mr. President, in the absence of any request for a rollcall vote on this particular amendment, that we would be pleased to accept the Senator's amendment.
James Sasser: “We restored in the Budget Committee 70 percent of the President's cut of the so-called low-income home energy…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget priorities and amendments related to low-income home energy assistance and prenatal care funding.
Share
More from James Sasser
I am pleased the conference committee agreed to fully fund this program in the conference report. This program is important and does deserve full funding. And I thank Senator Gorton and Senator Harkin for their efforts with respect to this…
But it is true, is it not, that a family of four making $16,000 a year gets no tax credit under this Republican proposal that the Senator from Indiana is lauding today? Is that not correct?
A working family of four making $16,000 a year would get no credit under this plan. Is that not correct?
My thanks are to Senator Boxer for her tireless efforts on behalf of these children's programs. The Budget Committee, as well as America's children, have been well served by her participation in this year's budget process.





