we restored in the Budget Committee 70 percent of the President's cut of the so-called low-income home energy assistance, and we also tried to increase funding for prenatal care. The thrust of this amendment offered by the Senator from Pennsylvania is in agreement with the priorities that we are pursuing in the Budget Committee. So I would just say, Mr. President, in the absence of any request for a rollcall vote on this particular amendment, that we would be pleased to accept the Senator's amendment.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget priorities and amendments related to low-income home energy assistance and prenatal care funding.
Share
More from James Sasser
I have just a couple of comments. Again, with regard to the whole question here of forming a commission to recommend savings to Congress, one of the problems we have in Government now is that we have too many commissions. The cost of these…
I rise today in support of S. 1560, which would make the Social Security Administration an independent agency. I believe this legislation elevates this important Federal agency to its proper status and acknowledges the importance of the…
Is the Senator from Indiana trying to represent that this is a refundable tax credit to people who make under $16,000 a year?
I share the distinguished chairman of the Agriculture Committee's enthusiasm for the WIC Program. I would point out that the budget resolution as reported by the Budget Committee included $3.6 billion for this program, an 11 percent…





