But the truth is, they constructed this problem for themselves, and they constructed it by moving ahead in the face of assertions that if you do this, military spending is going to take 75 percent of the cuts. But they went ahead and did it anyway. We will see how it works out. Maybe they will be able to save themselves to some extent. But I predict that when all the dust settles, the Exon-Grassley amendment is going to cause a reduction in military spending below the levels that the President proposed.
James Sasser: “But the truth is, they constructed this problem for themselves, and they constructed it by moving ahead in the face of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Exon-Grassley amendment on military spending.
Share
More from James Sasser
I am pleased the conference committee agreed to fully fund this program in the conference report. This program is important and does deserve full funding. And I thank Senator Gorton and Senator Harkin for their efforts with respect to this…
Yes indeed, Madam President. That would be my view also. The ``relation back'' provision merely relates to determining when a security interest in a motor vehicle is perfected in accordance with State law. Clarifying that ``relation back''…
You have a paranoid, isolated, dangerous state now on the verge of possessing nuclear weapons.
It is my understanding, that every appellate circuit that has examined this issue has held that State laws that allow the timing of perfection to ``relate back'' to an earlier date are consistent with and not in conflict with Federal…





