Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 8, 1995
as the gentleman well knows, on the Committee on the Judiciary we are not doing away with the exclusionary rule completely. There are still certain protections out there. The law enforcement, although they do not do this anymore, they may have done this back in 1914 when this was necessary to formulate this rule, but people do not beat folks in back rooms with rubber hoses to extract confessions anymore. However, if they did, certainly the exclusionary rule would still be available. Mr. Speaker, what we are simply saying is that folks make mistakes. As long as they act in good faith, and a judge has to make that determination from an objective third party standpoint, that evidence ought to come in and not punish society because of a mistake. There are other avenues that that can be addressed in. However, we did, once we came to the House floor, we had a good, healthy debate, but we had truly bipartisan support on this, and the bill passed, as I recall, overwhelmingly.
Said by
Ed Bryant
Tennessee

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the exclusionary rule and its implications during a House debate.

Share

More from Ed Bryant

Feb 8, 1995

In this body we are talking about following what the courts are already beginning to do as the pendulum swings back toward a fair balance in protecting not only, again, not only the criminals' rights, but the victims' rights.

govinfo.gov
Mar 13, 1996

Mr. Chairman, this is a narrow amendment, one that I think is very appropriate and necessary, given the apparent loss of credibility that our judiciary system is suffering in this country. It is narrow in the sense that it amends the law…

govinfo.gov
Feb 8, 1995

Literally, ``habeas corpus'' means ``you have the body.'' It started out in the 1800s, as I remember reading, where people who were wrongfully convicted, or even perhaps kept in jail without a trial, used that as a mechanism to have a…

govinfo.gov
Feb 8, 1995

Actually, it is excluding evidence from the trial. That is the remedy that the Court has foisted upon us. If it was deemed illegal evidence, then it is actually kept away from the jury. A classic example is the ongoing trial in California…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation