in the debate over a balanced budget amendment, we are hearing from the opposition a worn-out and failed argument. They use it every time we try to bring spending under control. They are trying to prevent fiscal responsibility and change. The opponents of a balanced budget amendment are now saying it will cut into Social Security. Mr. Speaker, that just is not true and is misleading. Mr. Speaker, our budget can be balanced without touching Social Security. Social Security benefits will not be affected by a balanced budget amendment. I would not support one if it did. I do not want to hurt the 900,000 people in my State who benefit from Social Security. Mr. Speaker, we owe those who have paid their hard-earned dollars into Social Security their benefits. Mr. Speaker, for those out there who would like to vote for this, I commend this resolution to my colleagues for their full support.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the impact of a balanced budget amendment on Social Security.
Share
More from Ed Bryant
Of course, that depends on the States. But I think you are looking, as opposed to the 10 to 15 years that are probably average today, you are looking at a much shorter period of time. If you could keep it under 5 years and work down from…
I do rise in support of H.R. 911. I believe this is a good bill. I think, No. 1, it is a timely bill. As has already been said today, given the renewed spirit of voluntarism advocated by our President and other distinguished leaders…
There are at least three avenues that people sentenced to the death penalty can travel. Of course, they have their natural State appeals. Then there is a habeas corpus procedure within the State, and then the Federal habeas corpus…
In this body we are talking about following what the courts are already beginning to do as the pendulum swings back toward a fair balance in protecting not only, again, not only the criminals' rights, but the victims' rights.





