Let me try to give a primer on this. As far as the exclusionary rule, that is a judicial court creation. It appears nowhere in the Constitution. We have heard that bantered about in our arguments, that it violated the Constitution, what our forefathers wrote, those kinds of things. Actually, it is a rule that was crafted by the courts to in effect punish police officers for unlawful conduct. And over the years, there has been a constant balancing act between the rights of society as opposed to the rights of the criminal. And over the past number of years, many of us feel that that pendulum has swung too far over in favor of the rights of the criminal and, in some cases, has actually resulted in the exclusionary rule being applied in trials that guilty people have gone free or, even before that, you recognized you have got a bad case because of this. You would have to plea bargain out or even dismiss a case.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the exclusionary rule and its implications for law enforcement and criminal rights.
Share
More from Ed Bryant
The Supreme Court. We are just expanding what they are doing to allow for this reasonable mistake on the part of the police officer in gathering evidence. If he makes a reasonable mistake in good faith, that is subject to the same…
I would like to inform the House of the passing of one of Tennessee's valuable leaders, Mayor James Thomas Wigginton. Tommy Wigginton, mayor of Michie, TN died earlier this month at the age of 52. Mayor Wigginton dedicated his life to the…
the 104th Congress has been keeping its promises. From real crime legislation to giving much-needed reform to Federal regulations, we are indeed keeping our promises. One of our promises to America has been to reform the welfare system. We…
But I too have known Mr. Quillen's long time through Tennessee, even though I am on the opposite end of the State. He is known certainly there by reputation and for what all he has done for Tennessee over the years. But it seems to me as…





