While I appreciate my colleague's interest in keeping the Federal spending in check, I would note that the 12 bills reported by the Appropriations Committee collectively adhere to the Fiscal Responsibility Act. How funds are allocated within that top line may be different than it was in previous years, but cutting these regional commissions won't actually reduce overall spending. It would just result in spending somewhere else, maybe even somewhere more objectionable to my colleague. As with the previous amendment, I respectfully urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Chuck Fleischmann
As we have been debating the amendments to this energy and water bill, for some of the amendments I have risen in strong support and strong opposition. With all due respect to the gentleman from California, I rise in the staunchest…
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Pursuant to House Resolution 1370 and rule XVIII, the Chair declares the House in the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for the consideration of the bill, H.R. 8997. The Chair appoints the…
I claim time in opposition to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 minutes.
I rise as the designee of the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Granger). Mr. Chair, I move to strike the last word. The Acting CHAIR. The gentleman from Tennessee is recognized for 5 minutes.





