While I appreciate my colleague's interest in keeping the Federal spending in check, I would note that the 12 bills reported by the Appropriations Committee collectively adhere to the Fiscal Responsibility Act. How funds are allocated within that top line may be different than it was in previous years, but cutting these regional commissions won't actually reduce overall spending. It would just result in spending somewhere else, maybe even somewhere more objectionable to my colleague. As with the previous amendment, I respectfully urge a ``no'' vote, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Share
More from Chuck Fleischmann
I hold my dear colleague and friend from Texas in the highest esteem. I think he is one of our brightest and best Members, and he has served so well on the Energy and Commerce Committee. It is a pleasure and privilege to serve with him. I…
I hereby remove my name as cosponsor of H.R. 977. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman's request is granted. ____________________
Once again, I respectfully and vehemently disagree with my friend and colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. Garamendi). I represent the great people of the city of Oak Ridge in Tennessee, the birthplace of the Manhattan Project…
I claim the time in opposition. Mr. Chairman, this amendment would cut funding for the Appalachian Regional Commission, which supports hundreds of cost-shared projects, partnering with private industry to bring needed jobs to this…





