I enjoyed listening to the comments of my friend from Ohio. I think you guys are going to like the amendment I am getting ready to offer. Today I rise to offer an amendment to S. 2155--the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act--of which I am a cosponsor. My amendment is a simple correction that would clarify the intent of this original bill as it relates to custodial banks. As originally introduced, section 402 was intended to provide better tailored capital requirements for true custodial banks. However, there have been concerns raised that the current definition of this section, following revisions during the committee consideration, could open this provision to a wider group of financial institutions. I know that was not the intent of my colleagues, and this technical correction amendment makes clear that section 402 applies only when the primary focus of the banking organization is custodial activities. Section 402 is not intended to provide relief to an organization engaged in consumer banking, investment banking, or other businesses, and that also happens to have some custodial business or a banking subsidiary that engages in custodial activities. In conclusion, section 402 was intended as a very narrowly tailored provision, focused on true custodial banks. This technical correction amendment would clarify the scope of 402. I am requesting a vote and urge my colleagues to support adoption of this amendment. I yield the floor.…
Share
More from Bob Corker
we have eight votes, two of which I think we may be able to take. I hope that those who wish to have votes may talk just a little bit so that we can speed up the process. The first vote will be 15 minutes; the remainder of the votes will…
for the Committee on Foreign Relations I report favorably the following nomination list which was printed in the Record on the date indicated, and ask unanimous consent, to save the expense of reprinting on the Executive Calendar that this…
I know Senator Inhofe is trying to get to fly home. Do we know the order here? The PRESIDING OFFICER. There is no consent request setting up an order.
through the Presiding Officer I wish to ask the Senator from Indiana, what you are saying is that you are doing everything you possibly can do to ensure that if your amendment passes, never in the future will your amendment be relied upon…





