It was my understanding that all TARP funding was to be used for things the taxpayer would get back. In other words, these were supposed to be investments for which the taxpayers knew they would get 100 percent of their money back and more. So to use this money, is this not taking away from the very essence of what TARP was to be used for and now spending money we know the taxpayers will never get back?
Bob Corker: “It was my understanding that all TARP funding was to be used for things the taxpayer would get back. In other words…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the use of TARP funding during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Bob Corker
We will both speak very briefly. Why don't you go ahead, and then I will go. The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
I appreciate the Senator from Indiana answering those questions. Today, we are, as you know, establishing precedent on a number of things. No. 1, we overwhelmingly decided that if the War Powers Resolution is used in this matter, only…
I want to thank our ranking member and my friend, Senator Menendez, for his tremendous cooperation for many years but especially over this last week, and Senator Kaine for coming in and supporting it. I want to reiterate what the ranking…
I am proud that Senator Menendez and I worked to pass legislation with the entire committee, establishing the global fund to end modern slavery.





