And to the question that Mr. Preston raised earlier about Afghanistan and getting back to the fact that the administration has not called this a Global War on Terror, but has--you know, is certainly carrying out counterterrorist operations all around the globe, if Afghanistan winds down at some point--let us say 24 months from now we do not have people doing what they now, today, are doing--would there need to be an AUMF to continue to strike entities that, you know, could pose a threat to us down the road?
Editor's note · Context
Corker questions the need for authorization to use military force post-Afghanistan.
Share
More from Bob Corker
I rise to speak on the issue before us. On every occasion, I too have done what is necessary to keep us from alienating our ally Saudi Arabia. I think I was the last man standing, during the Obama administration, in my trying to make sure…
section 36(b) of the Arms Export Control Act requires that Congress receive prior notification of certain proposed arms sales as defined by that statute. Upon such notification, the Congress has 30 calendar days during which the sale may…
I thank the Senator from New Jersey and our distinguished ranking member for his question and for working with me to pass this important legislation. ____________________





