Elizabeth Warren is a smart person. There are things I agree with her on, and there are things I disagree with her on. But on that point, I absolutely agree. If we think about the moral hazard issue, that means a business that wants to run its business the way America generally has run business--on their own, they don't want to be involved in government support--they would be at a disadvantage. That is the other moral hazard. An institution in Tennessee or South Dakota that wants to go out and lend more money to small business and goes out and raises equity to do so, that equity is going to cost more than this. So a bank that chooses to take advantage of a government program actually has an advantage over a company that wants to run itself the way most Americans want to see small business and companies run. There are all kinds of moral hazards. I know the notion of small business attracts a lot of people. I hope people on both sides of the aisle will think about this, realize how insidious this is, think about the next idea that comes after this. Again, it is another government investment into the private sector. We have gone from systemic risk to auto companies, to suppliers of auto companies. Now we are looking at going into small business. We sure have gone the gamut here. It is time to go the other way. Tennesseans have spoken loudly about the fact that they don't want to see any more government involvement in the private sector. It is time to stop it now.
Bob Corker: “Elizabeth Warren is a smart person. There are things I agree with her on, and there are things I disagree with her on.…”
Editor's note · Context
Corker discusses the implications of government involvement in the private sector and moral hazards affecting small businesses.
Share
More from Bob Corker
for the Committee on Foreign Relations I report favorably the following nomination lists which were printed in the Records on the dates indicated, and ask unanimous consent, to save the expense of reprinting on the Executive Calendar that…
I know Senator Inhofe is trying to get to fly home. Do we know the order here? The PRESIDING OFFICER. There is no consent request setting up an order.
I think it is important when using expedited procedures, especially on matters of national security such as this, the Senate limit consideration to the matter at hand. Therefore, I raise a point of order that amendments offered under 50…
I ask unanimous consent that the joint resolution be considered read a third time. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Without objection, it is so ordered. The joint resolution was ordered to be engrossed for a third reading and was read the third time.





