I am very troubled by how it has degenerated into a debate about intellectual property rights as compared to saving lives. It is really an unfair debate, because there is no comparison in terms of what we are talking about. Intellectual property rights, our trade policies, many of them were developed and set into stone way before people were dying from HIV and AIDS. So we should not even be making that comparison tonight. We are talking about the basic values of our country, of people in our country who care about people who are dying. We are not really talking about property rights. I think after tonight's debate, this House needs to go back to the drawing board and really reassess our trade policies and how we instruct our trade representatives. The whole world is looking at this House of Representatives to stop what we are doing in terms of our trade policies and to say, yes, we want these countries to begin to be developing their own generic drugs so that they can save the lives of millions and millions of their citizens.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the debate on intellectual property rights versus saving lives in relation to HIV and AIDS.
Share
More from Bill Lee
the fact that the acting president and CEO is a DOGE individual doesn't disqualify him from making this statement. It is corruption. Sure, it has been going on since the eighties, but so have a lot of things that are corrupt. We must…
Medicaid, healthcare outcomes and the cost of healthcare are of the utmost importance to our states. Not only because they are such a big piece of our budget but because it is about serving some of the most vulnerable in our communities.
Tennessee has a “really good chance” at being one of two states in the running for a $50 billion nuclear energy campus.
We have an illness within our election system. Our elections have been rendered infirm or at least very insecure by some of these features that I noted just a few minutes ago, including the fact that the 1993 NVRA, as passed by Congress…





