Reserving the right to object, as I look at the language proposed by my colleague from New Jersey, I would accept the rest of it except for the words ``especially the President of the United States.'' The rest of it is unobjectionable. The point here is that without pointing to any one specific individual, we should all be able to acknowledge, as a sense of the Senate, that we do hold these truths as self-evident; that our country was founded on these very strong ideals. Even if, as the resolution itself acknowledges, we have failed at times to live up to them, we have still done it. So I would accept the modification but only with the removal of the words ``especially the President of the United States.'' The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from New Jersey.
On the recordJuly 2, 2020
Share
More from Bill Lee
May 15, 2026
I think it’s really important that the courts will weigh in on this. The legislature has followed the authority and the process that they believe fairly and appropriately divides districts, as they have done for generations as has happened…
May 15, 2026
I have conversations with the president on a regular basis about what he wants. But this is about what members of the General Assembly want.
Dec 17, 2025
I, nonetheless, take umbrage--great umbrage in fact--to a couple of characterizations to which I must now respond. First, as to what she characterizes as the ``long bureaucratic process,'' this process is itself quite short, especially in…
May 15, 2026
I think the General Assembly had the obligation and the authority to look at maps.





