On the recordSeptember 10, 2003
But I must say that this is a very moderate amendment, it is a very conservative amendment, and I was, quite frankly, surprised he would go for it. But in the spirit of compromise, he did. So, very seldom do I believe that something is better than nothing, but I believe that this is such a fundamental injustice as it relates to our consumers that I had to support this very modest measure. Quite frankly, a creditor should not be allowed to increase interest rates if consumers are paying the debt according to the agreed upon terms. They should not be allowed to raise interest rates based on payment histories of another debt. That is just fundamentally wrong. When individuals agree to a contract, when a consumer believes that they are doing the right thing and paying their monthly payments, how in the world can they get set up to fail? That is what this does. An interest rate that jumps from 7 percent to 29 percent, bankruptcy, certainly, will follow if, in fact, this does not fit within the consumer's financial scheme.
Source
govinfo.gov




