Mr. Chairman, my amendment prohibits funds to finalize, implement, administer, or enforce the CFPB's rule entitled ``Registry of Nonbank Covered Persons Subject to Certain Agency and Court Orders.'' Mr. Chairman, there is a recurring theme here. That is because the CFPB is unconstitutional and their funding is unconstitutional. I would hope and expect the Supreme Court to rule in that way so that Congress can rule and administer funds appropriately. That being said, we have an obligation to rein in their out-of- control regulation. The CFPB's proposed rule seeks to publicly identify so-called repeat financial law offenders by establishing a database of enforcement actions taken against certain nonbank covered entities. Specifically, the proposed rule would require certain nonbank entities to register with the bureau and to provide regular updates on such covered orders. The proposed rule also includes obtaining enforcement actions against organizations that have already settled with State or local authorities. Mr. Chairman, this is empowering an agency that has already gone too far. It has gone beyond its mandate, it is unconstitutional, and I reserve the balance of my time.
On the recordNovember 8, 2023
Share & report
More from Andy Ogles
Mar 25, 2025
Mr. Chair, the definition of a ``foreign entity of concern'' in this bill would include any company subject to the jurisdiction or direction of a government like China's. While constructive, there is still nothing in the underlying text of…
Jul 4, 2025
Given the scale and scope of President Trump's recent achievements—especially the impending enactment of the Big Beautiful Bill, the historic act that will ignite America's Golden Age—it is essential that we immortalize President Trump's…
Sep 25, 2024
Mr. Chairman, just to be clear, the persecution is rather stark: enforced disappearance, torture or cruel, inhumane, and degrading treatment or punishment; harsh and life-threatening prison conditions; arbitrary arrests or detentions…





