At no point in American history has the judiciary considered the surgical or chemical castration of healthy children to be a compelling or even legitimate health concern and it shouldn't start now.
Editor's note · Context
Ogles argues against the judicial consideration of gender-affirming care for children.
Share & report
More from Andy Ogles
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, I thank my colleague for supporting my amendment. As we look at the jurisdictions across the country that may be ignoring current Federal law, whether by ordinance…
Mr. Chair, there are nearly 300 sanctuary jurisdictions in the United States. That is 300 places in our Nation that refuse to cooperate with Federal law enforcement to detain and remove illegal aliens. That is why this underlying bill is…
Mr. Chair, this amendment simply inserts or adds a clarifying clause. While religious student groups are free to select people who aren't members of their religion to lead them, most people agree that it is reasonable for a Muslim student…





