Mr. Chairman, again, I want to point out in its Janus decision, the Supreme Court affirmed that employees have a First Amendment right to opt out. The decision didn't say that the employee has a First Amendment right 1 month out of the year. It said that they have the right. This rule is unreasonable in that it requires an employee, if they need or decide they want to opt out, to wait 11 months. That is not what the decision says. Mr. Chairman, you have a First Amendment right to say no. Furthermore, once you have opted out, why, then can the union then ignore your First Amendment right and opt you back in the following year? That is not the intent of this decision, and it is not our obligation to ensure the stability of a union. Moreover, this decision was to protect the rights of workers. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Andy Ogles
Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 17, beginning on line 1, after ``leadership standards'', insert ``, including standards…
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Chair, I thank my colleague for supporting my amendment. As we look at the jurisdictions across the country that may be ignoring current Federal law, whether by ordinance…
Mr. Chair, I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Redesignate section 4 as section 5 and insert after section 3 the following: SEC. 4. STATEMENT…
Mr. Chair, I think it is shortsighted to allow Americans to die on our streets because the Chinese Communist Party is flooding our country with fentanyl. I think it is shortsighted that we allow the Chinese Communist Party to influence our…





