On the record
It needs no argument to show that legislation which has produced such baneful consequences should be abrogated, or else made to conform to the genuine principles of republican government.
Source
gutenberg.orgAndrew Johnson: “It needs no argument to show that legislation which has produced such baneful consequences should be abrogated, or else…”
Editor's note · Context
Johnson argues for the repeal of harmful legislation that contradicts republican principles.
Share
More from Andrew Johnson
Jul 17, 1868
The danger of a defeat of the people's choice in an election by the House of Representatives remains unprovided for in the Constitution.
Jan 6, 1869
I transmit herewith, in answer to a resolution of the House of Representatives of the 16th of December last, a report from the Secretary of State of the 6th instant.
Jul 17, 1868
In compliance with and execution of the act of Congress before mentioned, do issue this my proclamation, announcing the fact of the ratification of the said amendment by the legislature of the State of Louisiana.
Jul 17, 1868
The danger of a defeat of the popular choice in an election by the House of Representatives is no greater than in an election made nominally by the people themselves.
Other voices in this conversation
