It is not only a contradiction, it is a sad irony that somehow in the name of economic security we can, according to their approach, pay a company $1 billion-plus, but we can't find a way to pay for $1 billion in bioterrorism and food safety. We can't afford that. But we can afford $1 billion retroactive payments to some of the largest corporations in the country. How ironic. How incredibly misguided that is. Yet that is the debate.
Thomas Daschle: “It is not only a contradiction, it is a sad irony that somehow in the name of economic security we can, according to…”
On the recordNovember 27, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing funding priorities related to economic security and bioterrorism.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
Feb 2, 2016
Senator Tom Daschle recently said he thinks Members of the Senate spend more time fundraising than they do working in Congress.
Dec 6, 2021
Compromise is the oxygen of democracy. And Bob Dole provided a lot of oxygen over those years he was in Senate leadership.
May 2, 2021
It will use Social Security and Medicare surpluses. It will create the same deficit situation, I promise you, as we have seen all through the 1980s and early `90s.
May 12, 2013
The American people, by survey after survey, say they want these tax loopholes closed when they are informed particularly of the loopholes which allow corporations to shift revenue to a tax haven.





