Political Quotes

On the recordApril 30, 2019
shortly before Easter, the junior Senator from Vermont introduced a new version of his so-called Medicare for All plan. Given the staggering pricetag of his previous plan, it was reasonable to wonder if he would think about producing something that was at least a bit more modest and achievable. So what is the new plan like? Is it any more realistic? Did he figure out a way to actually pay for a government takeover of healthcare? Well, the answer is no. In fact, the new plan is even worse. It is more unrealistic, more costly, and even more likely to result in massive tax hikes on middle-class Americans. Analysis of a previous version of the Vermont Senator's Medicare for All plan found that it would cost $32 trillion over 10 years. Now, to put that number in perspective, that is more money than the Federal Government has spent combined in the last 8 years on everything-- defense, law enforcement, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, education, the environment, agriculture, Foreign Affairs--everything. Here is what the Washington Post had to say back in 2017 about the pricetag for government-run healthcare: But the government's price tag would be astonishing. When Sen. Bernie Sanders . . . proposed a ``Medicare for all'' health plan in his presidential campaign, the nonpartisan Urban Institute figured that it would raise government spending by $32 trillion over 10 years, requiring a tax increase so huge that even the democratic socialist Mr.…
Said by
John Thune
Republican · South Dakota

Share

More from John Thune

Jun 17, 2026

We only got 48 votes; we had that vote last week on all five components.

dailycaller.com
Jul 24, 2026

The math on that hasn’t changed.

rollcall.com
Jul 23, 2026

It’s a possibility that, if necessary, we could pull that budget resolution passed by the House and use it to fund government.

abcnews.com

Other voices in this conversation