once again the House Republican leadership has brought us a bill in H.R. 925, the Private Property Protection Act, which addresses a legitimately important issue, but which is overly broad, ill-considered and poorly drafted. I believe the debate on this important issue should continue, and so I will for now support this legislation in order for the Senate and the conference committees to have an opportunity to revise and improve the legislation. If no such significant improvement is forthcoming from those bodies, however, I am very doubtful that I will be able to vote for this bill on final passage.
Dusty Johnson: “once again the House Republican leadership has brought us a bill in H.R. 925, the Private Property Protection Act, which…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the Private Property Protection Act during House debate.
Share
More from Dusty Johnson
It is unrealistic to expect almost any piece of legislation to pass by unanimous consent, a bill that has just been introduced that exact morning. No matter how simple it is, there are going to be people who are going to object. So that is…
I would rather wake up every morning worried about the price of corn in a South Dakota field than worried about the price of oil in an Iranian oil field.
I have to dispute that because even the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, which has endorsed my bill, says that the bill does not single out favored political functions over its favored ones. You understand, under…





