Again, I am trying to keep this--let's not argue. OK? Let's focus on areas of agreement. So reduction in force, again, I think we probably have a philosophical disagreement there. I am not associating myself with anybody else's remarks. That is something that I think reasonable people can disagree with, and I think reasonable people can come to an accommodation. Again, we are talking about making sure that 2.8--I think is about the number, 2.8--million Federal employees aren't worried about getting their next paycheck. That so overwhelms, quite honestly, the smaller differences about the length of the bill or what reduction in force. Again, I am willing to come a long way in terms of--
Dusty Johnson: “Again, I am trying to keep this--let's not argue. OK? Let's focus on areas of agreement. So reduction in force, again, I…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about federal employees' job security and the need for agreement on related issues.
Share
More from Dusty Johnson
While I am disappointed in the outcome, I am committed to helping Republican candidates get elected in November.
I don’t have any idea what’s next, but I know leaders eat last.
Great. Listen, listen, I have barely spent any time here, OK. The bottom line is, in those hearings, I asked witnesses: How much have we spent combating climate change? Five to six trillion dollars. Our Energy Secretary puts the number at…
In reclaiming my time briefly, let me emphasize the fact that if you pass this now--again, to the Senator from Michigan, I am literally begging him: Do not object. Do not object. It is still going to take a couple of days to actually pass…





