On the recordMay 10, 2010
Is that argument to be made that the dispersants have more of a cosmetic effect by making it no longer visible on the surface than an actual benefit environmentally in the long run?
Source
congress.govIs that argument to be made that the dispersants have more of a cosmetic effect by making it no longer visible on the surface than an actual benefit environmentally in the long run?
Questions the environmental effectiveness of dispersants versus their cosmetic benefits.
Share
More from Sheldon Whitehouse
We're actually somewhat generous about letting [the oil companies] keep half of the excess profits, but we want at least half of it to go back.
This is waste, and it treats a national memorial to President Kennedy as if it were a private renovation project.
The allegations against Graham Platner in the Politico story are extremely serious and I am withdrawing my support.
Can you believe the guy, or did he and Trump announce the $1.9bn Trump justice fund in a month, and now we’re back where we started?