And presumably, Mr. Pruitt, it goes without saying that if the EPA is going to consider cost to the industry of confirming to pollution guidelines it should also consider benefits to the public from cleaner air, cleaner water and the results of that compliance, right?
Whitehouse insists on the need for EPA to weigh public benefits against compliance costs.
Share & report
More from Sheldon Whitehouse
How do you have an issue that you win 74 [percent] to 12 [percent] and you don’t ride that horse as hard as you can?
cooked up in back rooms, cloaked in fake numbers (that) loots our country (for) the least deserving people you could imagine feels (like) a crime scene.
Particularly when there is so much money to be made. So much flows through Social Security. If you take it over by wrecking it and then sending in your private-equity friends and tech bros to get it operational again and then let them…
Other voices in this conversation
