If we vote for retroactive immunity, we violate the rule of law taking away legitimate claims in legitimate litigation in a manner that is unprecedented and unconstitutional. If on the other hand we do nothing, we leave American companies gagged by the state secrets privilege in ongoing litigation. This amendment is a sensible, fair, bipartisan alternative that takes away no rights, that follows the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that honors the separation of powers principles and leaves no litigant gagged by the Government. Please support the amendment.
Sheldon Whitehouse: “If we vote for retroactive immunity, we violate the rule of law taking away legitimate claims in legitimate litigation…”
On the recordFebruary 12, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Debating an amendment related to retroactive immunity and state secrets privilege.
Share
More from Sheldon Whitehouse
Sep 23, 2026
Most of the dealbreaker humps we’re over, but now it’s refining the language, taking raw agreements into legislative texts and figuring out what schedule for voting succeeds.
Aug 30, 2026
I would say I was an early believer in Josh’s race. I served in the Senate with Tom Harkin. I know what Iowa can deliver because I saw Tom Harkin in action.
Sep 9, 2026
President Trump’s 2017 tax law and Big, Beautiful-for-Billionaires bill handed billionaires and big corporations massive tax breaks on private jets. The Trump administration now says it would be ‘burdensome’ to close the private jet tax…





