I offered the amendment, I offered the budget amendment in the committee that actually would provide for the prescription drug benefit. Nowhere in our amendment, nowhere in our resolution, did we require this program to begin in 2003. My dear colleague, the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Ryan), talked about that this would not start for another couple of years. That is not the truth. The Democratic amendment, the proposal that we put forth, would simply instruct the Committee on Ways and Means to begin immediately to provide a $40 billion benefit for prescription drugs for our seniors. What came out was a plan that I referred to here as the Bentsen plan that he referred to earlier. This chart that I show right here is the Republican plan for prescription drugs. It was mushy, as our ranking member said. It had nothing to it, no substance whatsoever. They proposed a plan that did nothing for prescription drugs. Back in Rhode Island where I come from, many seniors who have worked all their lives are facing now $5,000, $6,000, $7,000 and even $8,000 a year with prescription drug costs.
Robert Weygand: “I offered the amendment, I offered the budget amendment in the committee that actually would provide for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the proposed budget amendment for prescription drug benefits for seniors.
Share
More from Robert Weygand
I believe that, as written, we cannot ensure that U.S. citizens and citizens of other countries will get the safeguards they deserve therefore, I will be voting against granting the president fast-track authority and urge my colleagues to…
In closing, let me remake a couple of the points that have been said so eloquently by my colleagues here. First, this proposed amendment is not about campaign finance reform. This is more properly before discussion and debate on voters'…
while I am in support of H.R. 4365, the Child Health Research and Prevention Amendments, this bill should not be on the floor today under the suspension of the rules--where no member can offer an amendment to strengthen and improve this…
I am rising to oppose this resolution and this piece of legislation simply because we have not set our priorities straight. In this bill, the Republicans have determined that their priority is a $175 billion tax cut. They do not hide that…





