Thank you. First, although it is not explicitly referenced in the wording of the amendment whether its terms would apply to rail corridors that already are railbanked, and which already have been transferred from the railroad to the railbanking agency, it is my understanding that your amendment does not apply to corridors where a notice or certificate of interim trail use under section 1247(d) of title 23, United States Code, already has been issued by the Surface Transportation Board. The amendment only will be applied prospectively. Am I correct in my understanding?
Lincoln Chafee: “Thank you. First, although it is not explicitly referenced in the wording of the amendment whether its terms would apply…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of an amendment related to rail corridors during a legislative session.
Share
More from Lincoln Chafee
today I am introducing the Underground Storage Tank Compliance Act of 2003. While this bill is being introduced today, it already has a long history. The Superfund Subcommittee conducted two hearings on the bill last year. We have received…
I want to pay tribute to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a man for whom I had the utmost respect. One of the first times I was presiding in the Senate, Senator Moynihan was speaking from the floor. What he had to say and the way he said it made a…
Congress must make an immediate, thorough review of the Government's response to Hurricane Katrina and its aftermath. As a member of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, I am committed to working with Chairwoman Susan Collins and…
Included within Senate Report 107-219, and repeated in Chairman Stevens' Overview and Summary of his amendment to H.J. Res. 2, the Omnibus Appropriations Bill, is report language stating the Appropriations Committee's strong support for…





