As a preliminary matter, numerous rights-of-way have been approved in the past as compatible uses in various refuges, and this legislation does not alter the basis under which those activities may be approved in the future. With respect to the periodic reviews, the reevaluation of existing uses is required "when conditions under which the use is permitted change significantly or when there is significant new information regarding the effects of the use, but not less frequently than once every 10 years." For uses that are authorized for periods of less than 10 years, it is my understanding that the Fish and Wildlife Service will, under normal and usual circumstances, review the use at the time of the reauthorization of the activity. The only exception to this would be in situations in which significant new information is developed regarding the effects of the use, or conditions under which the use change significantly.
Lincoln Chafee: “As a preliminary matter, numerous rights-of-way have been approved in the past as compatible uses in various refuges…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the approval process for rights-of-way in wildlife refuges.
Share
More from Lincoln Chafee
Included within Senate Report 107-219, and repeated in Chairman Stevens' Overview and Summary of his amendment to H.J. Res. 2, the Omnibus Appropriations Bill, is report language stating the Appropriations Committee's strong support for…
as we move forward on this measure, I noted in the Senate Report accompanying the FY 2003 Commerce, Justice, State, and the Judiciary Appropriations bill that the Appropriations Committee urged the Economic Development Administration (EDA)…
the State of New Hampshire doesn't have an income tax or State sales tax. All of its revenue is generated by a property tax. Am I correct?
Chafee is under fire from conservatives for bucking the party line on many issues including Iraq.





