We do not address that, nor did the Breaux amendment address it. The question really is, should the Federal Government not make its appropriation, for the 1994 level, in the year 1998, or, as you said, 2000--we do not address that here. But I cannot believe that, with 100 Senators, all representing States here, that they are going to permit their State in some way to be punished, or lack funds, or have to continue their effort at 80 percent when the Federal Government does not do its matching share. But we do not specifically address that problem. We address the sanction problem.
Lincoln Chafee: “We do not address that, nor did the Breaux amendment address it. The question really is, should the Federal Government…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing federal funding and state appropriations during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Lincoln Chafee
Today marks the 15th anniversary of National Sportsmanship Day, which is celebrated on the first Tuesday of each March. National Sportsmanship Day was the creation of the Institute of International Sport at the University of Rhode Island…
Does the Senator hear from his school committees and local councilmen about the rising costs of special education and the difficulty that places on the property tax payer?
I would like to thank the Republican Leader for his willingness to address concerns raised by me and our colleagues from Maine regarding certain provisions in H.R. 5005, the Homeland Security Act of 2002. In the interests of clarity, I…
I call this amendment the Property Tax Relief Amendment of 2006. This amendment moves funding of IDEA to 20 percent of the cost of a municipality, only 20 percent of the promised 40-percent goal set in 1975. Schools account for the…





