few people had ever heard of the White House Travel Office before the Clinton administration took office. Now the White House Travel Office is a household name and its former employees have been falsely accused, they have been fired, they have been investigated by the IRS and the FBI, they have been defamed, and in one case indicted and finally, after a trial, they were fairly acquitted. These employees served at the pleasure of the President. He could have replaced them any time he wanted. There is no argument about that. But it is the manner in which these employees were fired, the manner in which they were treated, and the web of improprieties uncovered as a result of the investigation into these firings that I find most troubling. The White House, which promised what Newsweek magazine called, 'the most stringent ethical requirements of any administration ever,' has been the White House that has been entangled in one ethical misadventure after another.
Lincoln Chafee: “few people had ever heard of the White House Travel Office before the Clinton administration took office. Now the White…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the ethical issues surrounding the White House Travel Office during the Clinton administration.
Share
More from Lincoln Chafee
Today marks the 15th anniversary of National Sportsmanship Day, which is celebrated on the first Tuesday of each March. National Sportsmanship Day was the creation of the Institute of International Sport at the University of Rhode Island…
I also add that of all the talk about tax relief in this Chamber, we do not get enough talk about property tax relief. I urge your support for this amendment. The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there further debate on the amendment? If not, the…
I want to pay tribute to Daniel Patrick Moynihan, a man for whom I had the utmost respect. One of the first times I was presiding in the Senate, Senator Moynihan was speaking from the floor. What he had to say and the way he said it made a…
Does the Senator hear from his school committees and local councilmen about the rising costs of special education and the difficulty that places on the property tax payer?





