I know that there is a difference between authorization and appropriation. But clearly, the committee has not authorized this without hoping that it will be appropriated, that can be only my conclusion. My second question is: is there a method of paying for this in the legislation? In other words, I can only assume that probably the President, in his budget request, has found some way of paying for it or adding it to the deficit. How about the difference? In other words, the difference here is some $400 million. Is there a way of paying for that in here?
John Chafee: “I know that there is a difference between authorization and appropriation. But clearly, the committee has not authorized…”
On the recordMarch 10, 1994
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Questioning the funding methods for a proposed piece of legislation.
Share
More from John Chafee
Jun 8, 2016
It seems that the problems man creates for our planet are never-ending. But we have found solutions for prior difficulties, and we will for these as well.
May 17, 1994
I think we are embarking on an unusual path for the Federal Government to require compliance: When it is granting a substantial sum of money but not 100 percent that it cannot make any requirement. Maybe the thing should be reversed. Maybe…
May 12, 1994
Would there be an increased risk to public health, if the Administrator uses this authority to select a less stringent maximum contaminant level?
May 12, 1994
OK. Can the administration lift the embargo without any resolution of Congress anytime it wants?





