I know that there is a difference between authorization and appropriation. But clearly, the committee has not authorized this without hoping that it will be appropriated, that can be only my conclusion. My second question is: is there a method of paying for this in the legislation? In other words, I can only assume that probably the President, in his budget request, has found some way of paying for it or adding it to the deficit. How about the difference? In other words, the difference here is some $400 million. Is there a way of paying for that in here?
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the funding methods for a proposed piece of legislation.
Share
More from John Chafee
I think we are embarking on an unusual path for the Federal Government to require compliance: When it is granting a substantial sum of money but not 100 percent that it cannot make any requirement. Maybe the thing should be reversed. Maybe…
I would like to like take a moment to discuss my grave concerns with the Helms amendment adopted by the Senate last week. The essence of the Helms amendment is as follows: No funds made available through the Department of Education under…
One final question on cost considerations. In considering the cost savings that may be realized from selecting less stringent standards, what size systems is the Administrator to consider?
today the Senate approved the Goals 2000: Educate America Act. Regrettably, I was not here earlier in the day to vote on many of the remaining amendments to Goal 2000. As some of you may know, I was at home in Rhode Island attending the…





