Again, while I appreciate my colleague's attempt to find somewhat of a common ground on this issue, it does not address the underlying problem. The issue of the ADA being around for 30 years--it is well-known now. People are even proactive about finding out what their responsibilities are under the ADA, as opposed to just waiting until they are notified of a problem and then perhaps complying with. No, we should not treat people with disabilities any differently than anyone else who is protected under civil rights laws. That is why we have them in the first place. I would urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment. Let's work together on finding a better common-ground solution. But this amendment and the underlying bill is not the answer. Mr. Chair, I yield back the balance of my time.
Share
More from Jim Langevin
President Biden acknowledged that the United States lacks a comprehensive way to establish mandatory minimum cybersecurity requirements.
I know the damage that guns can cause firsthand. When I was 16, an accidental gunshot severed my spinal cord and left me paralyzed. And yet, the damage caused by that gun pales in comparison to the destruction caused by assault weapons…
I want to thank you for your leadership of this committee but, in particular, your support and attention to people with disabilities.
I have an amendment at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Add at the end of title LVIII of division E the following: SEC. 58___. ADMISSION OF ESSENTIAL…





