On the recordMarch 5, 2019
I think a robust discussion about what is actually in the Nuclear Posture Review and whether or not it makes sense to maintain that deterrence, that is the debate we were having.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Langevin advocates for thorough debate on the Nuclear Posture Review's implications for deterrence.
Share & report
More from Jim Langevin
May 16, 2022
I want to know how is the Air Force thinking about other capabilities, like cyber, space, conventional capability, et cetera, when it comes to integrated deterrence.
Jul 14, 2022
Madam Speaker, earlier this week, I led my Democratic and Republican colleagues in introducing legislation to eliminate discrimination against parents and guardians with disabilities. Together with Representatives Bass, Bacon, Fitzpatrick…
Nov 16, 2022
I want to give a special thank you to Representative Langevin for your testimony today, for being here, and for sharing your personal experiences with travel to help improve legislation to ensure that the experience is improved for all…
Other voices in this conversation
