I rise in opposition to this amendment. I think the whole amendment fundamentally misperceives the nature of our reauthorization. What we are trying to do is take what we have learned over the last several years and incorporate it into this legislation. One thing we have learned is that young people who have been exposed to preschool programs like Head Start lose their advantage over the years, unless adequate comprehensive and thorough transition programs... At the heart of the amendment of the gentlewoman from Washington is a very sensible and very pragmatic approach, which is to invest in the types of transitional programs which will sustain what we have achieved through Head Start. We are going to once again, I hope, vigorously support Head Start. But to do so without this transitional mechanism is, I think, to be somewhat misplaced in our priorities. So we have to, I think, support this amendment. The gentlewoman from Washington is right. We have to sustain the progress we have made through Head Start.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to the reauthorization of Head Start programs.
Share
More from Jack Reed
Artificial intelligence will continue to shape the battlespace of the future, and our military must be equipped with every tactical and technical advantage it needs to win in this complex environment.
The Committee has directed inquiries to the Department, and we will be conducting vigorous oversight to determine the facts related to the circumstances.
Vague generalities are not helping this committee make critical judgments.
it is not enough that President Trump has injected chaos and inflation into the economy with his illegal tariffs, unauthorized war, and his so-called Big Beautiful Bill. He is also stripping protections for average Americans against being…





